4.8
on G2
Confluence
Glitter AI
Confluence is Atlassian's enterprise wiki built for internal knowledge management with deep Jira integration. Glitter AI converts screen recordings into annotated step-by-step guides. They target different documentation workflows—so which one is right for your team, and is there a better option that covers both use cases?
Feature Matrix
A comprehensive side-by-side comparison of documentation capabilities, AI features, enterprise readiness, and integrations between Confluence and Glitter AI.
| Feature |
Confluence
|
Glitter AI
|
|---|---|---|
| Video to Documentation Conversion | ||
| Real-World Video Support | ||
| Screen Recording Capture | ||
| Upload Pre-Recorded Videos (Loom, Zoom) | ||
| AI Content Generation | ||
| AI Detail | Rovo AI — 80+ connectors, 20+ agents | Screen-to-steps with annotated screenshots |
| Audio Transcription | ||
| Multi-Language Support | ||
| Auto-Translation | Via Rovo AI agents | |
| Version Control | ||
| Knowledge Base Platform | ||
| Multi-Tenant Portals | ||
| Custom Domain Support | ||
| Custom Branding | Pro+ only | |
| AI Chatbot | ||
| Embeddable Widget | ||
| Browser Extension | ||
| API Access | ||
| SSO (SAML/OAuth) | Enterprise only | |
| SOC 2 Compliance | ||
| GDPR Compliance | ||
| Audit Logs | ||
| Role-Based Access Control | ||
| Analytics & Reporting | ||
| Content Reuse & Templates | ||
| Real-Time Collaboration | ||
| Built-in LMS / Courses | ||
| Helpdesk Integration | ||
| Free Plan Available |
Data as of February 2026. Features are based on publicly available information and vendor documentation. Confluence Rovo AI included on Standard and above plans as of October 2024.
Strengths & Weaknesses
Deep Dive
Confluence is a mature documentation platform with hierarchical spaces and pages, rich text editing, templates, and content reuse blocks. Teams create structured internal wikis with version history, approval workflows, and deep Atlassian integrations. Glitter AI takes a radically different approach — users hit record, perform a workflow on screen, and AI automatically generates annotated step-by-step guides with screenshots. Confluence wins on depth and structure; Glitter AI wins on speed and simplicity for how-to guide creation. Neither tool can convert uploaded training videos, real-world footage, or existing video libraries into documentation.
Confluence's Rovo AI is the more mature offering — included in Standard and above plans as of October 2024, it provides cross-tool search across 80+ apps, 20+ pre-built agents for tasks like release note generation and OKR writing, and Rovo Chat as an AI assistant across the Atlassian suite. Glitter AI's AI is narrowly focused on screen recording processing — detecting UI elements, extracting audio transcription, and generating step descriptions automatically. Glitter AI has no chatbot, no agent framework, and no cross-system integrations. For AI breadth, Confluence's Rovo platform significantly outpaces Glitter AI, though neither supports agentic autonomous documentation pipelines.
Confluence is enterprise-grade with SOC 2, GDPR, ISO 27001 compliance, SAML SSO with multiple IDPs, audit logs, role-based access control, and a 99.9% uptime SLA on Premium and above. It scales to 150,000 users per site and supports advanced governance for regulated industries. Glitter AI offers GDPR compliance and SAML SSO only on its Enterprise tier, with no SOC 2 certification, no audit logs, and no role-based access control. For organizations in regulated industries — healthcare, finance, government — Confluence is the clear choice on security posture. Glitter AI is better suited to small teams with lower compliance requirements.
Both tools share a critical limitation for teams serving external clients — neither supports multi-tenant portals, custom domains, or client-branded documentation delivery. Confluence is fundamentally internal-facing; its spaces are designed for employees, not customers. Glitter AI generates shareable links and can export to Notion or Google Docs, but has no publishing platform. Teams at consulting firms, implementation partners, or SaaS companies needing to deliver branded documentation to multiple external clients will find both tools inadequate. This shared gap is precisely where a platform like Docsie — with multi-tenant portals, custom domains, and one-to-many delivery — addresses what neither competitor can provide.
Our Recommendation
Confluence and Glitter AI are not direct competitors — they solve fundamentally different problems. Confluence is an enterprise internal wiki optimized for large teams already invested in the Atlassian ecosystem, with mature collaboration, version control, and Rovo AI. Glitter AI is a lightweight screen-recording-to-guide tool for individuals and small teams who need quick how-to documentation without manual writing. Choosing between them depends entirely on whether you need an enterprise knowledge management platform or a fast guide generator — but both tools leave significant gaps for teams with video libraries, multilingual needs, or external client delivery requirements.
Choose Confluence if you need...
Choose Glitter AI if you need...
Choose Docsie if you need...
Winner: Docsie
Both Confluence and Glitter AI leave critical gaps that Docsie fills. Confluence cannot convert video into documentation and is not built for external client delivery. Glitter AI is limited to live screen recordings, has no knowledge base platform, no version control, and no enterprise compliance. Docsie's six-pillar platform converts any video type into structured documentation, manages it with version control and AI, delivers it through multi-tenant branded portals, trains users with built-in LMS and certifications, automates workflows with autonomous agents on private infrastructure, and monitors compliance in real time — across 100+ languages and for multiple clients simultaneously.
Common Questions
Q: Can Glitter AI replace Confluence as a knowledge base?
A: No. Glitter AI is a guide creation tool, not a knowledge base platform. It generates individual step-by-step documents from screen recordings but has no hierarchical content structure, version control, search, permissions, or centralized publishing. Confluence offers all of these as a full enterprise wiki. Glitter AI is better viewed as a documentation input tool that can export guides into Confluence, not a replacement for it.
Q: Does Confluence support video-to-documentation conversion like Glitter AI?
A: No. Confluence has no video recording or video-to-docs capability. Rovo AI can generate text content and perform cross-tool searches, but it cannot process screen recordings or any video into step-by-step documentation. Glitter AI's core feature — converting screen recordings into annotated guides — is absent from Confluence entirely. Teams needing both a knowledge base and video conversion must use both tools together or find a platform that unifies them.
Q: Which tool is better for small teams creating internal how-to guides?
A: Glitter AI is the faster choice for small teams needing quick how-to guides from browser workflows. Its browser extension and instant AI-generated output require no learning curve and minimal setup. Confluence's free tier supports up to 10 users and provides more structure, but its complexity is overkill for simple process documentation. For teams that primarily need to document software workflows quickly, Glitter AI's simplicity wins — but for long-term knowledge management, Confluence's structure is more sustainable.
Q: Can either tool handle multilingual documentation?
A: Neither tool natively supports multi-language documentation publishing. Confluence offers auto-translation via Rovo AI agents, but it is not a dedicated multi-language publishing system. Glitter AI has no translation or multi-language support whatsoever. Teams serving global audiences in multiple languages will find both tools fall short — platforms like Docsie offer 100+ language auto-translation with version inheritance across language variants built into the core product.
Q: Is there a better alternative to both Confluence and Glitter AI?
A: Yes — Docsie addresses the core gaps both tools share. Unlike Confluence, Docsie converts any video (screen recordings, real-world footage, uploaded Loom/Zoom files, PDFs, and websites) into structured documentation. Unlike Glitter AI, Docsie includes a full knowledge base platform with version control, multi-tenant portals for external client delivery, built-in LMS with certifications, autonomous AI agents, and real-time compliance monitoring — all across 100+ languages. Teams that need more than an internal wiki or a quick guide generator consistently find Docsie covers both use cases in a single platform.
Q: How does pricing compare between Confluence and Glitter AI?
A: Confluence starts at $0 for up to 10 users, then $5.42/user/month on Standard (with Rovo AI included) and $10.44/user/month on Premium. Glitter AI offers a free tier with watermarked output, then $20/user/month on Pro. For small teams, Glitter AI's Pro plan is more expensive per user than Confluence Standard, but delivers a fundamentally different capability. At scale, Confluence's per-user model grows costly — and both tools require separate platforms for client-facing documentation delivery, adding further cost and complexity.
Docsie converts any video — screen recordings, real-world footage, uploaded Zoom and Loom files — into structured knowledge bases, then delivers them through multi-tenant branded portals to unlimited clients. With built-in LMS, 100+ language auto-translation, autonomous agents, and real-time compliance monitoring, Docsie goes far beyond what either Confluence or Glitter AI can offer — in a single platform with transparent workspace-based pricing.
Free AI credits included. No credit card required. Convert a 10-minute training video free.
Start creating professional documentation that your users will love