4.8
on G2
360Learning
Tango
Both 360Learning and Tango serve enterprise teams, but their readiness for large-scale deployments differs significantly. This comparison examines security, compliance, scalability, admin controls, and support SLAs to help enterprise buyers make an informed decision — and explains why Docsie addresses the gaps both tools share.
Enterprise Feature Matrix
A detailed comparison of enterprise-grade features including security, compliance, access control, scalability, and administration capabilities across both platforms.
| Enterprise Feature |
360Learning
|
Tango
|
|---|---|---|
| SSO (SAML) | Business plan (SAML, OAuth) | Enterprise plan only (SAML, SCIM) |
| SCIM Provisioning | Enterprise only | |
| Role-Based Access Control | ||
| Audit Logs | ||
| SOC 2 Compliance | ||
| GDPR Compliance | ||
| HIPAA Compliance | ||
| Data Residency (EU) | EU (France-based) | |
| Version History | 14 days (Pro), 365 days (Enterprise) | |
| Multi-Tenant Portals | ||
| Custom Domain | Custom learning portal | |
| API Access | Business plan | |
| Uptime SLA | Enterprise SLA | N/A |
| Dedicated Support | Business plan (dedicated success manager) | Enterprise plan |
| PII / Sensitive Data Controls | Automatic PII blurring (Enterprise) | |
| Custom Branding | Partial (branded exports only) | |
| Advanced Analytics | Business plan | Pro and above |
| HR System Integrations | Workday, SAP, BambooHR | |
| Compliance Monitoring | ||
| Air-Gap / Private Infrastructure |
Data as of February 2026. Features are based on publicly available information and vendor documentation. Enterprise features may require custom contracts.
Strengths & Weaknesses
Deep Dive
An in-depth analysis of four critical enterprise readiness dimensions — security and compliance, scalability and performance, administration and control, and support and SLA commitments.
360Learning holds SOC 2 certification and is GDPR-native as a France-based company, offering EU data residency by default — a genuine advantage for European enterprise buyers. It supports SAML and OAuth SSO on Business plans. However, it lacks HIPAA compliance, SCIM provisioning, and PII detection controls. Tango is SOC 2 and GDPR compliant, and adds automatic PII blurring and SCIM provisioning on Enterprise tiers. Neither platform supports HIPAA, compliance monitoring, or air-gap deployments — leaving regulated industries like healthcare, finance, and defense underserved by both tools.
360Learning scales to large internal L&D deployments through its Business plan, supporting enterprise HR integrations with SAP SuccessFactors, Workday, and BambooHR for automated user sync. Its SCORM compliance supports large libraries of existing e-learning content. Tango's scalability is constrained by its per-user pricing model and the absence of an API, which limits programmatic administration at scale. Neither platform offers multi-tenant architecture, meaning organizations serving multiple client entities or business units must provision entirely separate instances rather than managing a single deployment that delivers to multiple audiences.
360Learning provides audit logs, role-based access control, and a dedicated success manager for Business plan customers, giving admins reasonable oversight of learning activity and user management. Tango offers RBAC and SCIM on Enterprise, plus advanced analytics to track workflow engagement — useful for IT and enablement administrators. However, Tango's complete absence of audit logs is a meaningful compliance gap; in many regulated industries, audit trails are a procurement requirement. Neither platform provides granular content permissions at the multi-tenant level, custom domain control per client, or the content governance workflows that enterprise documentation teams typically require.
360Learning provides a dedicated success manager on Business plans and an enterprise SLA, though the specific uptime guarantee is not publicly documented. Tango offers dedicated support on Enterprise tiers but publishes no uptime SLA whatsoever — an unusual omission for a platform targeting enterprise buyers. Enterprise procurement teams typically require contractual SLA commitments as a baseline. Both platforms offer onboarding assistance and customer success resources, but neither provides the transparent 99.9% uptime commitments, custom SLA negotiation, or dedicated success infrastructure that mature enterprise documentation and training platforms publish as standard commercial terms.
Our Recommendation
360Learning is the stronger enterprise choice between the two — it has genuine SOC 2 compliance, EU data residency, audit logs, HR integrations, and an enterprise SLA. Tango offers useful capabilities like PII blurring and SCIM provisioning on Enterprise tiers, but its lack of audit logs, no published uptime SLA, and no API access are significant gaps for serious enterprise procurement. Both tools are purpose-built for narrow use cases — 360Learning for internal L&D, Tango for browser workflow documentation — and neither provides the full-spectrum enterprise knowledge management that large organizations need.
Choose 360Learning if you need...
Choose Tango if you need...
Choose Docsie if you need...
Winner: Docsie
Both 360Learning and Tango serve narrow enterprise use cases — internal L&D and browser workflow capture respectively — but share the same critical gaps: no multi-tenant delivery, no HIPAA readiness, no air-gap capability, no real-time compliance monitoring, and no unified platform for converting, managing, and delivering knowledge at scale. Docsie addresses all of these gaps with SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA-ready compliance, a 99.9% uptime SLA, full SSO options (SAML, OAuth, OIDC, Azure AD, Okta), audit logs, private infrastructure support, and multi-tenant portals — making it the more complete enterprise-ready choice for organizations that need more than a single-purpose L&D or workflow capture tool.
Common Questions
Q: Which platform is more compliant — 360Learning or Tango?
A: 360Learning has a stronger overall compliance posture for most enterprise buyers: SOC 2 certification, GDPR-native EU data residency, and audit logs. Tango is SOC 2 and GDPR compliant and adds PII blurring and SCIM provisioning on Enterprise tiers, but lacks audit logs and any published data residency option. For European organizations, 360Learning's France-based infrastructure is a clear advantage. For organizations requiring HIPAA compliance, neither platform qualifies.
Q: Does either platform support HIPAA for healthcare organizations?
A: Neither 360Learning nor Tango supports HIPAA compliance. Both platforms are SOC 2 and GDPR certified, but neither has published HIPAA BAA availability or the technical controls (audit trails for PHI, encryption attestations, breach notification procedures) that healthcare enterprise buyers require. Healthcare organizations evaluating either tool for training or documentation will need to look at alternatives with explicit HIPAA-ready infrastructure.
Q: Do 360Learning or Tango offer audit logs for enterprise compliance?
A: 360Learning provides audit logs as part of its enterprise feature set, which is essential for organizations in regulated industries that need to track who accessed, created, or modified content. Tango does not offer audit logs at any pricing tier — a meaningful gap for enterprise security teams conducting access reviews or responding to compliance audits. If audit log availability is a procurement requirement, 360Learning has the advantage over Tango.
Q: Which tool scales better for large enterprise deployments?
A: 360Learning scales more predictably for large internal L&D deployments through its HR system integrations (Workday, SAP, BambooHR) that automate user provisioning and sync. Tango's Enterprise tier adds SCIM for automated provisioning, but the absence of an API and per-user pricing model creates cost and integration challenges at scale. Neither platform supports multi-tenant delivery, which limits their utility for enterprises serving multiple business units or client organizations from a single system.
Q: Is there a better alternative to both 360Learning and Tango for enterprise use?
A: Docsie is a stronger enterprise-ready alternative that addresses the key gaps shared by both platforms. Docsie provides SOC 2 Type II compliance, GDPR and HIPAA-ready infrastructure, a published 99.9% uptime SLA, full SSO options, audit logs, and multi-tenant portals that let a single deployment serve unlimited client organizations with custom branding. Unlike 360Learning (internal L&D only) and Tango (browser workflow capture only), Docsie covers the full knowledge lifecycle — converting any content into structured docs, managing with version control, delivering through branded portals, and training through a built-in LMS with certifications.
Q: What uptime SLA do 360Learning and Tango provide?
A: 360Learning references an enterprise SLA in its commercial terms but does not publish a specific uptime percentage publicly. Tango publishes no uptime SLA at all, which is an unusual omission for a platform targeting enterprise buyers. Enterprise procurement teams typically require contractual SLA commitments as a baseline condition. Organizations with mission-critical documentation or training requirements should request written SLA terms during vendor evaluation for both platforms.
Docsie delivers what both 360Learning and Tango can't: a fully enterprise-ready knowledge platform with SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA-ready compliance, a 99.9% uptime SLA, multi-tenant portals, built-in LMS, autonomous agents, and real-time compliance monitoring — all on private infrastructure. One platform to convert, manage, deliver, train, automate, and monitor knowledge across your entire organization.
No credit card required. Free AI credits included to convert a 10-minute training video.
Start creating professional documentation that your users will love