Introduction
State the purpose of the UAT, the system/module under test, and the UAT approach.
Free Consulting Template
User acceptance testing for [system/module]
Use this template to user acceptance testing for [system/module].
| Field | Details |
|---|---|
| Category | Consulting |
| Owner | [Team or owner] |
| Version | [Version number] |
| Effective Date | [Date] |
| Review Cycle | [Monthly / Quarterly / Annual / Event-based] |
| Status | [Draft / In Review / Approved] |
State the purpose of the UAT, the system/module under test, and the UAT approach.
| Item | Details | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Item or requirement] | [Describe the relevant detail, evidence, or decision] | [Owner] | [Open / Complete] |
| [Item or requirement] | [Describe the relevant detail, evidence, or decision] | [Owner] | [Open / Complete] |
[Add context, assumptions, exceptions, evidence links, screenshots, calculations, or reviewer comments.]
Define what is in scope and out of scope for UAT. List all business processes and modules covered.
| Item | Details | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Item or requirement] | [Describe the relevant detail, evidence, or decision] | [Owner] | [Open / Complete] |
| [Item or requirement] | [Describe the relevant detail, evidence, or decision] | [Owner] | [Open / Complete] |
[Add context, assumptions, exceptions, evidence links, screenshots, calculations, or reviewer comments.]
Provide a detailed table of test scenarios with columns: Scenario ID, Business Process, Test Scenario Description, Test Steps (high-level), Expected Result, Priority (Critical/High/Medium/Low), Assigned Tester.
| Item | Details | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Item or requirement] | [Describe the relevant detail, evidence, or decision] | [Owner] | [Open / Complete] |
| [Item or requirement] | [Describe the relevant detail, evidence, or decision] | [Owner] | [Open / Complete] |
[Add context, assumptions, exceptions, evidence links, screenshots, calculations, or reviewer comments.]
Specify all test data needed, how it will be sourced (production copy, synthetic, manual), and any data masking requirements.
| Item | Details | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Item or requirement] | [Describe the relevant detail, evidence, or decision] | [Owner] | [Open / Complete] |
| [Item or requirement] | [Describe the relevant detail, evidence, or decision] | [Owner] | [Open / Complete] |
[Add context, assumptions, exceptions, evidence links, screenshots, calculations, or reviewer comments.]
Define the conditions that must be met before UAT can start (entry) and what constitutes successful completion (exit). Include quantitative thresholds.
| Item | Details | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Item or requirement] | [Describe the relevant detail, evidence, or decision] | [Owner] | [Open / Complete] |
| [Item or requirement] | [Describe the relevant detail, evidence, or decision] | [Owner] | [Open / Complete] |
[Add context, assumptions, exceptions, evidence links, screenshots, calculations, or reviewer comments.]
Describe the defect reporting process, severity definitions, resolution workflow, and escalation paths.
| Item | Details | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Item or requirement] | [Describe the relevant detail, evidence, or decision] | [Owner] | [Open / Complete] |
| [Item or requirement] | [Describe the relevant detail, evidence, or decision] | [Owner] | [Open / Complete] |
[Add context, assumptions, exceptions, evidence links, screenshots, calculations, or reviewer comments.]
List all UAT participants, their roles, and the testing schedule with milestones. Use Markdown tables for test scenarios and criteria. Be specific and measurable.
| Item | Details | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Item or requirement] | [Describe the relevant detail, evidence, or decision] | [Owner] | [Open / Complete] |
| [Item or requirement] | [Describe the relevant detail, evidence, or decision] | [Owner] | [Open / Complete] |
[Add context, assumptions, exceptions, evidence links, screenshots, calculations, or reviewer comments.]
Document review conclusions, approvals, unresolved items, and next review date.
| Role | Name | Date | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preparer | [Name] | [Date] | [Notes] |
| Reviewer | [Name] | [Date] | [Notes] |
| Approver | [Name] | [Date] | [Notes] |
Template Structure
Use this consulting template as a starting point, then customize each section to match your internal workflow, evidence, and signoff needs.
State the purpose of the UAT, the system/module under test, and the UAT approach.
Define what is in scope and out of scope for UAT. List all business processes and modules covered.
Provide a detailed table of test scenarios with columns: Scenario ID, Business Process, Test Scenario Description, Test Steps (high-level), Expected Result, Priority (Critical/High/Medium/Low), Assigned Tester.
Specify all test data needed, how it will be sourced (production copy, synthetic, manual), and any data masking requirements.
Define the conditions that must be met before UAT can start (entry) and what constitutes successful completion (exit). Include quantitative thresholds.
Describe the defect reporting process, severity definitions, resolution workflow, and escalation paths.
List all UAT participants, their roles, and the testing schedule with milestones. Use Markdown tables for test scenarios and criteria. Be specific and measurable.
Write a UAT Test Plan for a system or module implementation. Structure with these sections:
State the purpose of the UAT, the system/module under test, and the UAT approach.
Define what is in scope and out of scope for UAT. List all business processes and modules covered.
Provide a detailed table of test scenarios with columns: Scenario ID, Business Process, Test Scenario Description, Test Steps (high-level), Expected Result, Priority (Critical/High/Medium/Low), Assigned Tester.
Specify all test data needed, how it will be sourced (production copy, synthetic, manual), and any data masking requirements.
Define the conditions that must be met before UAT can start (entry) and what constitutes successful completion (exit). Include quantitative thresholds.
Describe the defect reporting process, severity definitions, resolution workflow, and escalation paths.
List all UAT participants, their roles, and the testing schedule with milestones.
Use Markdown tables for test scenarios and criteria. Be specific and measurable.
This UAT Test Plan defines the approach for validating the Order Management module implemented in Oracle Commerce Cloud for BrightStar Retail. UAT will be executed by business users from the Operations and Customer Service teams to confirm the system meets documented requirements before production deployment.
In Scope: - Online order creation and checkout flow - Order status tracking and notifications - Split shipment handling - Returns and exchanges - Inventory reservation and backorder management
Out of Scope: - Payment gateway integration (covered in SIT) - Warehouse management system picks (WMS team UAT)
| ID | Business Process | Scenario | Expected Result | Priority | Tester |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UAT-001 | Order Placement | Place a standard order with 3 items, standard shipping | Order created, confirmation email sent within 2 min | Critical | J. Rivera |
| UAT-002 | Order Placement | Place order with item exceeding available inventory | Backorder created, customer notified of delay | Critical | J. Rivera |
| UAT-003 | Split Shipment | Order with items from 2 warehouses | Two shipments created with independent tracking numbers | High | L. Park |
| UAT-004 | Returns | Initiate return for 1 item from a 3-item order | Return label generated, refund initiated for returned item only | Critical | M. Santos |
| UAT-005 | Exchange | Exchange size on an apparel item | Original item marked for return, new item reserved | High | M. Santos |
| UAT-006 | Status Tracking | Track order through each status stage | Status updates visible in customer portal at each stage | Medium | L. Park |
| UAT-007 | Cancellation | Cancel order before shipment | Order cancelled, inventory released, refund processed | High | J. Rivera |
| Data Type | Source | Volume | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Product catalog | Production copy (masked pricing) | 500 SKUs | Include apparel, electronics, accessories |
| Customer accounts | Synthetic | 25 test accounts | Mix of loyalty tiers (Bronze, Silver, Gold) |
| Warehouse inventory | Manual setup | 500 SKUs across 2 warehouses | Include low-stock and zero-stock items |
| Promo codes | Manual setup | 10 codes | Percentage, fixed amount, free shipping |
Entry Criteria: - All critical and high SIT defects resolved and retested - UAT environment provisioned with production-equivalent configuration - Test data loaded and verified - UAT testers trained on test scripts
Exit Criteria: - 100% of Critical scenarios pass - 95% of High priority scenarios pass - No unresolved Critical or High severity defects - Business sign-off obtained from Operations Director
| Severity | Definition | Resolution SLA | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | System unusable, no workaround | 4 hours | Order cannot be placed at all |
| High | Major function broken, workaround exists | 8 hours | Split shipment creates duplicate charges |
| Medium | Minor function impaired | 3 business days | Status email delayed by >10 minutes |
| Low | Cosmetic or minor UX issue | Next release | Button alignment on confirmation page |
Workflow: Tester logs defect in Jira (project: BSTAR-UAT) → Dev triages → Fix deployed to UAT environment → Tester retests → Closed or reopened.
| Phase | Dates | Activities |
|---|---|---|
| UAT Preparation | Jan 13–17 | Environment setup, data load, tester training |
| UAT Cycle 1 | Jan 20–31 | Execute all scenarios, log defects |
| Defect Fix Window | Feb 3–7 | Dev resolves Critical and High defects |
| UAT Cycle 2 (Retest) | Feb 10–14 | Retest failed scenarios, regression |
| Sign-Off | Feb 17 | Business sign-off meeting |
Record a walkthrough, training session, or process demonstration. Docsie AI turns it into structured documentation using this template as the starting framework.
Use the template manually, or let Docsie generate the first draft from source footage.
Handover of [project] to [client] operations
Migrating [data type] from [source] to [target]
Configuration of [module] in [ERP system]
Go-live preparation for [system] deployment
Technical architecture for [client] [project]
Requirements for [client] [project]
Template FAQ
Common questions about using and generating a uAT Test Plan.
Q: What is a uAT Test Plan?
A: A uAT Test Plan is a structured document for user acceptance testing for [system/module].
Q: Can I download this uAT Test Plan as Word or PDF?
A: Yes. This page includes free downloads in DOCX, PDF, and Markdown formats so you can edit, share, or import the template into your documentation system.
Q: Can Docsie generate this from a video?
A: Yes. Upload a process walkthrough, training recording, or screen capture to Docsie, then use this template structure to generate a first draft automatically.