4.8
on G2
Confluence
Glitter AI
Confluence charges per user across an enterprise wiki platform, while Glitter AI offers a simple per-user model focused on screen-recording-to-guide conversion. Neither pricing model is ideal for teams that need scalable, multi-client documentation delivery. This page breaks down every plan, hidden cost, and value trade-off — then shows why Docsie offers a smarter alternative.
Pricing Feature Matrix
A detailed breakdown of features included at each pricing tier for both Confluence and Glitter AI, so you can see exactly what you are paying for.
| Feature / Plan Detail |
Confluence
|
Glitter AI
|
|---|---|---|
| Free Plan Available | Yes — up to 10 users | Yes — limited recordings |
| Entry Paid Plan Price | $5.42/user/month (Standard) | $20/user/month (Pro) |
| Mid-Tier Plan Price | $10.44/user/month (Premium) | Custom (Enterprise only) |
| Enterprise / Custom Pricing | Yes — 801+ users | Yes — contact sales |
| Pricing Model | Per user per month | Per user per month |
| AI Features Included | Rovo AI on Standard+ (Search, Chat, 20+ Agents) | Basic AI guide generation on all plans |
| Storage Included | 2GB (Free), 250GB (Standard), Unlimited (Premium) | Not publicly specified |
| Custom Branding | Pro+ only | |
| Watermark Removal | N/A | Pro+ only |
| SSO / SAML | Standard+ (SAML, multiple IDPs) | Enterprise only |
| Analytics | Standard+ included | |
| Guest / External Access | Standard+ included | Team sharing on Pro+ |
| Uptime SLA | 99.9% on Premium+ | Enterprise only |
| Automation Runs | 100/month (Standard), Unlimited (Premium) | N/A |
| PDF Export | Pro+ only | |
| API Access | ||
| Dedicated Support | 24/7 on Premium+ | Enterprise only |
| Version Control | Unlimited page history (all plans) | |
| Multi-Tenant Portals | ||
| Video-to-Docs Conversion | Screen recordings only |
Pricing as of January 2026. Confluence prices shown are monthly (billed annually). Glitter AI pricing based on publicly available information. Both tools use per-user pricing models that scale linearly with headcount.
Strengths & Weaknesses
Deep Dive
An in-depth analysis of pricing value, scalability costs, and hidden limitations across both platforms to help enterprise buyers make an informed decision.
Confluence's Standard plan at $5.42/user/month delivers solid value for Atlassian-heavy teams — Rovo AI, analytics, automation runs, and guest access are all included. However, value degrades sharply for teams outside the Jira ecosystem, who pay for integrations they will never use. Glitter AI's Pro plan at $20/user/month is steep for what it offers — screen-recording-to-guide conversion without a knowledge base, version control, or analytics. For individual users creating internal how-to guides, Glitter AI's free tier is genuinely useful. Neither platform delivers strong value for teams needing external documentation delivery or multi-client portals.
Confluence's per-user pricing scales linearly and can become very expensive for large teams. A 100-user team on Premium pays $1,044/month — and Atlassian has implemented 5–8% price increases in recent years with more anticipated. Glitter AI at $20/user/month is even more expensive per seat, reaching $2,000/month for a 100-user team with no volume discounts publicly documented. Neither tool offers a workspace or consumption-based model that rewards efficiency at scale. Enterprise tiers for both require custom negotiations, adding unpredictability to procurement. Teams expecting rapid headcount growth will face linearly escalating documentation costs with both platforms.
Confluence's biggest hidden cost is ecosystem lock-in — full value requires Jira, Bitbucket, and the broader Atlassian stack, multiplying total spend. Premium is needed for 99.9% SLA and 24/7 support, pushing effective cost to $10.44/user/month for serious deployments. Glitter AI hides value behind its paywall aggressively — watermarks on free output, no PDF export on free, and custom branding only on Pro. Teams that need SSO, uptime guarantees, or dedicated support must negotiate Enterprise deals with no published pricing. Both tools also lack multi-tenant portals and custom domains, meaning teams delivering docs to external clients must invest in a separate documentation delivery platform on top of either tool's subscription cost.
Pricing Breakdown
Side-by-side view of every pricing tier for Confluence and Glitter AI, including what is included, what is missing, and where costs escalate.
Confluence offers more depth and better value at scale for internal teams in the Atlassian ecosystem — Rovo AI inclusion across paid plans is a genuine differentiator. However, per-user costs compound quickly, and recent price increases signal ongoing cost pressure. Glitter AI is expensive for what it delivers at $20/user/month — the Pro plan provides no analytics, no knowledge base, and no version control, making it a specialized point tool rather than a documentation platform. For teams needing to scale documentation delivery to multiple clients without per-seat cost inflation, both tools fall short. Docsie's workspace-based AI credit model — starting at $199/month for 15 users — removes per-seat pricing entirely and adds multi-tenant portals, 100+ language translation, and built-in LMS that neither competitor offers.
Our Recommendation
Confluence is a mature enterprise wiki built for Atlassian-ecosystem teams managing internal knowledge — its Rovo AI inclusion adds real value, but per-user pricing and ecosystem dependency limit its appeal outside large engineering organizations. Glitter AI is a focused screen-recording-to-guide tool that is fast and simple but priced high for its limited feature set and lacks the platform depth most growing teams need. Both tools serve narrow use cases well but share critical gaps — no external multi-tenant delivery, no video ingestion from existing files, and no consumption-based pricing model.
Choose Confluence if you need...
Choose Glitter AI if you need...
Choose Docsie if you need...
Winner: Docsie
Docsie addresses the core pricing and capability gaps shared by both Confluence and Glitter AI. Where Confluence charges per user and locks value behind the Atlassian ecosystem, and Glitter AI charges $20/user/month for a point tool without a knowledge base, Docsie's workspace-based AI credit model starts at $199/month for 15 users and scales by what you process — not how many seats you add. More importantly, Docsie covers the capabilities neither competitor can touch: converting any video type into structured documentation, delivering through multi-tenant branded portals to unlimited external clients, auto-translating into 100+ languages, and including a built-in LMS with course builder and certifications — all on SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, and HIPAA-ready infrastructure.
Common Questions
Q: How does Confluence pricing compare to Glitter AI for a 50-person team?
A: A 50-person team on Confluence Standard would pay approximately $271/month (billed annually at $5.42/user). The same team on Glitter AI Pro would pay $1,000/month at $20/user — nearly four times more. However, Confluence delivers a full wiki and collaboration platform at that price, while Glitter AI delivers screen-recording-to-guide conversion only. Neither tool offers a workspace-based model that avoids per-seat scaling.
Q: Does Confluence include AI features in its pricing or is it an add-on?
A: As of October 2024, Rovo AI is included in Confluence's Standard and Premium plans at no additional cost — it is no longer a separate add-on. This covers Rovo Search, Rovo Chat, and 20+ pre-built AI agents across the Atlassian suite. The Free plan includes limited Rovo search functionality. This makes Confluence's Standard plan at $5.42/user/month relatively competitive for AI-included internal documentation.
Q: What hidden costs should I watch for with Confluence?
A: The biggest hidden cost with Confluence is ecosystem dependency — unlocking full value typically requires Jira, Bitbucket, or other Atlassian tools, multiplying your total Atlassian spend. You also need Premium ($10.44/user/month) to access the 99.9% uptime SLA and 24/7 support, which are often non-negotiable for enterprise deployments. Atlassian has also implemented 5–8% price increases in recent years, so budget should account for annual cost creep.
Q: Is Glitter AI's free plan genuinely useful or is it too limited?
A: Glitter AI's free plan is useful for individual users wanting to try screen-recording-to-guide conversion without commitment, but it is limited in practice. The watermark on all exported content makes it unsuitable for sharing externally or with clients. The recording limit also restricts volume. For any team use case or client-facing output, the $20/user/month Pro plan is effectively required, making the free plan primarily a trial experience rather than a functional long-term tier.
Q: Is there a better alternative to both Confluence and Glitter AI for documentation pricing?
A: Yes — Docsie offers a workspace-based AI credit pricing model that avoids the per-user cost inflation of both Confluence and Glitter AI. Starting at $199/month for up to 15 users, Docsie includes video-to-docs conversion (any video type, not just screen recordings), multi-tenant client portals, 100+ language auto-translation, built-in LMS with certifications, and autonomous agents — capabilities neither Confluence nor Glitter AI offer. For teams scaling documentation across multiple clients or departments, Docsie's model becomes significantly more cost-effective than per-seat pricing as headcount grows.
Q: Can Glitter AI replace Confluence for team documentation?
A: No — Glitter AI and Confluence serve fundamentally different purposes and are not interchangeable. Confluence is a full enterprise wiki with version control, permissions, collaboration, and integration with Jira. Glitter AI is a specialized tool for converting screen recordings into step-by-step guides, with no knowledge base, no version control, and no long-form documentation management. Many teams actually use them together, exporting Glitter AI guides into Confluence pages. Neither replaces the other.
Docsie's AI credit model gives you video-to-docs conversion, multi-tenant client portals, 100+ language auto-translation, and a built-in LMS — all without per-seat pricing that compounds as your team grows. Convert any video type into searchable knowledge bases and deliver them to multiple clients from one platform, starting at $199/month for 15 users.
Free plan includes AI credits to convert a 10-minute training video. No credit card required.
Start creating professional documentation that your users will love