4.8
on G2
Common Questions
Q: How much does Confluence cost for a 50-person team?
A: At the Standard tier ($5.42/user/month), a 50-person team pays approximately $271/month or $3,252/year. At Premium ($10.44/user/month), that rises to $522/month or $6,264/year. Note that SSO, advanced permissions, and the 99.9% uptime SLA are only available on Premium and above — features many enterprise teams consider standard. Annual billing typically reduces these rates by 10–15%.
Q: Why did GitBook's pricing change so much in 2024–2025?
A: GitBook restructured its pricing model to a per-site plus per-user hybrid. The most significant change is that custom domains now require a $65/site fee — previously included in paid plans. This change disproportionately affects teams managing documentation for multiple products or clients, where site costs accumulate quickly. A team with five documentation sites now pays $325/month in site fees alone before any user costs.
Q: Does Confluence include AI in its base paid plan?
A: Yes, as of October 2024 Atlassian included Rovo AI across all paid Confluence plans (Standard and above) — it was previously a separate add-on. Rovo provides cross-tool search, AI chat, 20+ pre-built agents, and 80+ app connectors. The Free plan gets limited Rovo search access. GitBook's AI Assistant, by contrast, is only available at the Ultimate tier, which requires custom pricing.
Q: Are there hidden costs in either Confluence or GitBook?
A: Confluence's hidden costs include the Premium tier requirement for SSO and uptime SLA, plus annual price increases of 5–8% applied in 2024–2025. For GitBook, the $65/site custom domain fee is the most common surprise — teams used to platforms that include custom domains by default are often caught off-guard. Both platforms also lack video processing, multi-tenant portals, and LMS capabilities, meaning teams typically need additional tools that add to total cost.
Q: Is there a better alternative to both Confluence and GitBook?
A: For teams whose documentation needs go beyond internal wikis or developer portals, Docsie offers a fundamentally different value proposition. Docsie converts any video, PDF, or website into structured documentation using AI, delivers it through multi-tenant branded portals to multiple clients simultaneously, and includes a built-in LMS with course builder, certifications, autonomous agents, and compliance monitoring — all in one platform. Its AI credit pricing model means you pay for what you process rather than per user or per site, making it more cost-predictable at scale. Docsie's free plan includes real AI credits to convert a 10-minute training video with no credit card required.
Q: Which tool is better for non-technical documentation teams?
A: Confluence is more accessible to non-technical users than GitBook, but it still carries complexity overhead from its Atlassian heritage. GitBook requires familiarity with Git workflows and is explicitly designed for developer teams — non-technical writers often find it frustrating. Neither tool was designed with content writers, training coordinators, or implementation consultants as the primary user. Docsie is the better fit for mixed technical and non-technical teams, particularly those dealing with training content, client-facing documentation, or video-heavy workflows.
Deep Dive
A detailed analysis of how Confluence and GitBook stack up across the dimensions that matter most for enterprise documentation buyers evaluating pricing and long-term value.
Confluence delivers strong value at the Standard tier ($5.42/user/month) with Rovo AI now bundled — previously a costly add-on. For Atlassian-heavy teams, the Jira integration alone justifies the cost. GitBook's value equation shifted dramatically in 2024–2025: the base Plus plan starts at $65/site plus $12/user/month, meaning a 10-person team on one site pays $185/month minimum. Add a second documentation site and you're at $250/month before any user count changes. Confluence wins on per-user value for large internal teams; GitBook struggles to justify its restructured pricing unless you're building a single developer portal.
Confluence scales predictably on a per-user model — but that model becomes painful fast. A 100-user team at Standard costs $542/month; at Premium it's $1,044/month. The Enterprise tier requires 801+ users and custom pricing. GitBook's per-site pricing creates a different scalability problem: costs grow with the number of documentation sites, not just users. A SaaS company managing documentation for 10 products could face $650/month in site fees alone before accounting for any users. Neither model is inherently superior — they penalize growth in different ways. Confluence punishes user growth; GitBook punishes multi-product or multi-client documentation.
Confluence's hidden costs include the Premium tier requirement for SSO, uptime SLA, and advanced permissions — features many enterprise buyers assume are standard. Teams also face 5–8% annual price increases (implemented 2024–2025). GitBook's most significant hidden cost is the $65/site custom domain fee — teams migrating from platforms that include custom domains by default are often blindsided. Both tools also lack video-to-docs conversion, multi-tenant portals, and built-in LMS capabilities, meaning teams need additional platforms (Loom, Teachable, customer portal software) that add to total cost of ownership beyond what either tool charges.
Start creating professional documentation that your users will love