Master this essential documentation concept
An informal, undocumented method that workers develop to complete a task more efficiently or to overcome a limitation in the official documented process.
In documentation environments, workarounds are unofficial solutions that team members create when the established process fails to meet their needs. They emerge naturally in any organization where tools, workflows, or documented procedures have gaps, inefficiencies, or outright failures. While workarounds can signal ingenuity, they also represent a documentation debt that professionals must actively manage.
When a team member discovers a workaround — a clever shortcut or unofficial fix that makes a broken or inefficient process actually work — the instinct is often to record a quick screen capture and share it in a team chat. It gets the job done in the moment, but that video clip quickly gets buried, forgotten, or becomes outdated without anyone noticing.
The core problem with video-only approaches to capturing workarounds is discoverability and accountability. A workaround sitting in a video file has no searchable keywords, no version history, and no clear owner. New team members cannot find it when they hit the same obstacle, so they either reinvent the solution from scratch or, worse, follow the broken official process and produce incorrect results. Compliance and audit teams also have no visibility into which informal methods are actually being used in practice.
Converting those walkthrough videos into formal SOPs changes this entirely. Each workaround gets documented with clear steps, a rationale, and an owner — giving your team a single searchable reference instead of a scattered collection of screen recordings. It also creates an opportunity to evaluate whether the workaround should be promoted into the official process or flagged for a permanent fix. Either way, the knowledge is no longer locked inside a video file that only one person knows exists.
A documentation team's content management system does not support a specific table format required for API reference documentation, causing writers to produce inconsistent outputs or spend hours reformatting manually.
Writers develop a workaround using a pre-built HTML snippet stored in a shared notes file that they paste directly into the CMS raw editor, bypassing the broken table tool entirely.
1. Identify the specific table format that the CMS cannot render correctly. 2. Create a clean HTML template for the required table structure. 3. Store the snippet in a shared team resource (e.g., shared Notion page or team wiki). 4. Document the workaround steps with screenshots. 5. Notify all writers via team channel. 6. Add a ticket to the backlog requesting a permanent CMS fix or plugin.
All API reference pages use a consistent table format, writer time spent on reformatting drops significantly, and the workaround is visible to the entire team rather than siloed with one individual. The documented workaround also serves as a requirements brief for the permanent fix.
The official content review process requires three sequential approvals, but one approver is frequently unavailable, causing documentation releases to be delayed by days or weeks and blocking product launches.
Writers informally begin sending documents to an alternate subject matter expert for the blocked approval stage, completing the review out of sequence without updating the official workflow documentation.
1. Identify which approval stage is consistently blocked and causing delays. 2. Work with the documentation manager to designate an official backup approver. 3. Document the backup approval path as an official exception procedure. 4. Update the review workflow diagram to show the alternate path. 5. Communicate the updated process to all stakeholders. 6. Set a quarterly review to assess whether the bottleneck has been resolved.
Documentation releases meet product launch deadlines, the workaround is formalized as an exception procedure, and new team members learn the correct escalation path during onboarding rather than discovering it by accident.
The translation vendor requires files in a specific XML format, but the documentation tool exports only in Markdown. Writers manually convert files using a free online tool, introducing inconsistent encoding and occasional data loss.
A senior writer scripts a simple Python conversion tool and shares it via the team's shared drive, creating an unofficial but more reliable workaround than the online converter.
1. Document the exact XML schema required by the translation vendor. 2. Test the existing script against multiple document types. 3. Add error handling and a usage README to the script. 4. Store the script in a version-controlled repository accessible to all team members. 5. Train the team on running the script. 6. Submit a formal request to the tool vendor for native XML export support, citing the workaround as evidence of business need.
Localization file errors drop to near zero, the conversion process is repeatable and auditable, and the documented workaround provides concrete justification for requesting a native tool feature or switching vendors.
The organization launches a new line of video tutorial products, but the existing style guide covers only written documentation. Writers independently develop different approaches to timestamps, captions, and chapter titles, creating an inconsistent user experience.
One writer creates an unofficial one-page cheat sheet covering video documentation conventions and shares it in the team Slack channel, which becomes the de facto standard without formal approval.
1. Collect all informal conventions currently being used across the team. 2. Review industry standards and competitor approaches for video documentation. 3. Draft a formal style guide addendum covering the new content type. 4. Submit the addendum for review by the documentation manager and a subject matter expert. 5. Retire the informal cheat sheet once the official addendum is approved and published. 6. Add the new content type to the onboarding checklist.
Video documentation achieves a consistent style across all products, the informal workaround is elevated into official guidance, and the team has a clear process for handling future style guide gaps before they produce inconsistency.
Schedule periodic reviews specifically designed to surface undocumented workarounds that team members are using. These audits create a safe, structured opportunity for writers to share informal methods without fear of criticism, and they prevent workarounds from becoming permanent invisible fixtures in the workflow.
Not all workarounds are equal. Some represent genuine process improvements that should be formalized, others are temporary patches for known bugs, and some are risky shortcuts that violate compliance or quality standards. A classification system prevents blanket elimination or blanket acceptance.
When a workaround must remain in use temporarily, give it the same documentation treatment as any official procedure. Write clear steps, assign an owner, set an expiration or review date, and store it in a location accessible to the whole team. This prevents the workaround from becoming a permanent undocumented fixture.
Every workaround is a signal that the official process or tool has a gap. Documentation professionals should treat workarounds as firsthand evidence when submitting tool improvement requests, process change proposals, or vendor feature requests. Concrete examples are far more persuasive than abstract complaints.
New documentation team members are particularly vulnerable to workarounds because they follow the official documented process faithfully, only to encounter undocumented obstacles that experienced colleagues navigate invisibly. Proactively addressing workarounds during onboarding accelerates ramp-up time and prevents frustration.
Join thousands of teams creating outstanding documentation
Start Free Trial