Flowcharts

Master this essential documentation concept

Quick Definition

Visual diagrams that use symbols and arrows to represent the sequence of steps, decisions, and processes in a workflow or procedure.

How Flowcharts Works

flowchart TD A[Content Request] --> B{Review Type?} B -->|New Content| C[Research & Planning] B -->|Update Existing| D[Locate Current Version] C --> E[Create Draft] D --> F[Edit Content] E --> G{SME Review} F --> G G -->|Approved| H[Editorial Review] G -->|Needs Changes| I[Revise Content] I --> G H --> J{Final Approval?} J -->|Approved| K[Publish Content] J -->|Rejected| I K --> L[Update Documentation Index] L --> M[Notify Stakeholders] M --> N[End]

Understanding Flowcharts

Flowcharts are essential visual tools that transform complex processes into clear, sequential diagrams using standardized symbols and directional arrows. For documentation professionals, they serve as universal communication devices that bridge language barriers and simplify intricate workflows into digestible visual narratives.

Key Features

  • Standardized symbols: ovals for start/end points, rectangles for processes, diamonds for decisions
  • Directional arrows showing process flow and sequence
  • Decision branches with yes/no or multiple pathway options
  • Clear entry and exit points for every workflow
  • Logical sequence that follows top-to-bottom or left-to-right reading patterns

Benefits for Documentation Teams

  • Reduces cognitive load by presenting information visually rather than in dense text blocks
  • Enables quick identification of bottlenecks, redundancies, and process gaps
  • Facilitates stakeholder alignment during process reviews and approvals
  • Supports multiple learning styles and improves user comprehension
  • Creates reusable templates for similar processes across different projects

Common Misconceptions

  • Flowcharts are only useful for technical processes - they work equally well for editorial workflows and content strategies
  • More detail always equals better flowcharts - simplicity and clarity should take precedence over exhaustive detail
  • Flowcharts are static documents - they should be living documents that evolve with process changes

Turning Process Videos into Actionable Flowcharts

When documenting complex processes, your team likely captures workflow demonstrations through video recordings. These videos show the exact sequence of steps, decision points, and process flows that make up your critical procedures. While useful for initial training, videos alone make it challenging to reference specific decision points or quickly understand the logical structure of a process.

The problem with video-based process documentation is that flowcharts—visual diagrams that clearly map out decision paths and process sequences—remain locked inside linear video content. When team members need to quickly reference a decision point or understand process branches, scrubbing through video timestamps becomes inefficient and error-prone.

Converting your process videos into standard operating procedures with proper flowcharts transforms this experience. By extracting the decision logic and process steps from videos into structured documentation, you create navigable flowcharts that team members can reference instantly. These flowcharts provide clear visualization of conditional paths, process loops, and decision points that might be difficult to follow in video format alone.

For example, an onboarding video showing multiple approval paths can be transformed into a comprehensive flowchart that makes decision points and alternative processes immediately visible and actionable for all team members.

Learn how to efficiently transform your process videos into clear, actionable flowcharts and SOPs →

Real-World Documentation Use Cases

API Documentation Workflow

Problem

Development teams struggle to understand the complex review and approval process for API documentation updates, leading to delays and inconsistent documentation quality.

Solution

Create a comprehensive flowchart that maps the entire API documentation lifecycle from initial code changes to published documentation.

Implementation

1. Map all stakeholders (developers, technical writers, product managers, QA). 2. Define decision points (code review, technical accuracy check, user testing). 3. Create branching paths for different types of updates (new endpoints, deprecations, minor changes). 4. Include feedback loops and revision cycles. 5. Add estimated timeframes for each step.

Expected Outcome

Teams gain clear visibility into the documentation process, reducing cycle time by 30% and improving documentation consistency across all API releases.

User Onboarding Process Documentation

Problem

Customer support receives repetitive questions about account setup and initial configuration, indicating gaps in user onboarding documentation.

Solution

Develop flowcharts that visualize different user onboarding paths based on user types, subscription levels, and technical expertise.

Implementation

1. Analyze support tickets to identify common user paths and pain points. 2. Create separate flowcharts for different user personas. 3. Include decision diamonds for key choice points (subscription type, integration needs). 4. Add links to relevant help articles at each step. 5. Include alternative paths for edge cases and troubleshooting.

Expected Outcome

Support ticket volume decreases by 40% for onboarding-related issues, and user activation rates improve as users can self-serve more effectively.

Content Review and Approval Process

Problem

Editorial teams experience bottlenecks and confusion during content review cycles, with unclear handoff points and approval criteria.

Solution

Design a detailed flowchart that clarifies roles, responsibilities, and decision criteria at each stage of the content review process.

Implementation

1. Document current review stages and identify bottlenecks. 2. Define clear approval criteria for each review type. 3. Create parallel review paths for different content types (blog posts, whitepapers, product updates). 4. Include escalation procedures for disputed content. 5. Add feedback collection points and revision loops.

Expected Outcome

Content review cycles become 25% faster with improved quality scores, and team members report higher confidence in their roles and responsibilities.

Incident Response Documentation

Problem

During system outages, teams waste critical time navigating lengthy incident response procedures, leading to extended downtime and customer impact.

Solution

Create emergency-focused flowcharts that provide quick visual guidance for different types of incidents and severity levels.

Implementation

1. Categorize incidents by type and severity level. 2. Create separate flowcharts for each incident category. 3. Include immediate action steps and key decision points. 4. Add contact information and escalation paths directly in the flowchart. 5. Design for mobile viewing during crisis situations.

Expected Outcome

Mean time to resolution improves by 35%, and post-incident reviews show better adherence to established procedures and communication protocols.

Best Practices

âś“ Start Simple, Iterate Complex

Begin with high-level process flows before diving into detailed sub-processes. This approach helps stakeholders understand the big picture before getting lost in specifics.

âś“ Do: Create a master flowchart showing major phases, then develop detailed sub-flowcharts for complex steps. Use hyperlinks or references to connect them.
âś— Don't: Don't try to capture every possible scenario and exception in a single flowchart, as this creates visual clutter and reduces usability.

âś“ Use Consistent Symbol Standards

Maintain uniform symbol usage across all flowcharts to ensure universal understanding and professional appearance. Consistency reduces cognitive load for users.

âś“ Do: Establish a symbol legend and style guide for your organization. Use ovals for start/end, rectangles for processes, and diamonds for decisions consistently.
âś— Don't: Don't mix different flowchart standards or create custom symbols without clear documentation, as this confuses users and reduces accessibility.

âś“ Include Clear Decision Criteria

Decision points should contain specific, actionable criteria rather than vague questions. This eliminates ambiguity and ensures consistent process execution.

âś“ Do: Write decision questions with clear yes/no answers or specific criteria like 'Budget > $10,000?' or 'Customer Tier = Enterprise?'
âś— Don't: Don't use subjective decision points like 'Is it good enough?' or 'Should we proceed?' without defining measurable criteria.

âś“ Design for Your Audience

Tailor flowchart complexity and terminology to match your intended users' expertise level and context. Executive summaries need different detail than operational procedures.

âś“ Do: Use appropriate terminology for your audience, include relevant context, and provide the right level of detail for the user's decision-making needs.
âś— Don't: Don't create one-size-fits-all flowcharts for diverse audiences, and avoid technical jargon when creating flows for non-technical stakeholders.

âś“ Plan for Maintenance and Updates

Flowcharts become outdated quickly as processes evolve. Build update procedures and ownership into your flowchart governance from the beginning.

âś“ Do: Assign clear ownership, establish regular review cycles, version your flowcharts, and create easy-to-update formats using collaborative tools.
âś— Don't: Don't create static flowcharts in formats that are difficult to edit, and avoid unclear ownership that leads to outdated documentation.

How Docsie Helps with Flowcharts

See How Docsie Can Help

Build Better Documentation with Docsie

Join thousands of teams creating outstanding documentation

Start Free Trial