Commits

Master this essential documentation concept

Quick Definition

Commits are individual snapshots of changes made to documentation files that are saved and tracked in a version control system like Git. Each commit includes a unique identifier, timestamp, author information, and a descriptive message explaining what was changed. They create a chronological history of all modifications, enabling teams to track progress, revert changes, and collaborate effectively on documentation projects.

How Commits Works

flowchart TD A[Writer Creates Content] --> B[Stage Changes] B --> C[Write Commit Message] C --> D[Create Commit] D --> E[Local Repository] E --> F[Push to Remote] F --> G[Shared Repository] G --> H[Team Reviews Changes] H --> I{Approved?} I -->|Yes| J[Merge to Main Branch] I -->|No| K[Request Revisions] K --> A J --> L[Documentation Updated] D --> M[Commit History] M --> N[Track Changes] M --> O[Revert if Needed] style D fill:#e1f5fe style G fill:#f3e5f5 style L fill:#e8f5e8

Understanding Commits

Commits serve as the fundamental building blocks of version control in documentation workflows, capturing discrete changes to files and creating a permanent record of project evolution. Each commit represents a specific point in time when documentation was modified, reviewed, and deemed ready to be preserved in the project history.

Key Features

  • Unique hash identifiers that distinguish each commit from others
  • Commit messages that describe the nature and purpose of changes
  • Author attribution showing who made the changes and when
  • File diffs that highlight exactly what content was added, modified, or deleted
  • Parent-child relationships that maintain chronological order
  • Branch integration allowing parallel development streams

Benefits for Documentation Teams

  • Complete audit trail of all documentation changes over time
  • Ability to revert to previous versions when errors are introduced
  • Collaborative editing with conflict resolution capabilities
  • Release management through tagged commits and branching strategies
  • Integration with review processes and approval workflows
  • Backup and recovery through distributed version control

Common Misconceptions

  • Commits are only useful for code, not documentation files
  • Every small change requires an immediate commit
  • Commit messages don't matter for documentation projects
  • Commits automatically sync across all team members
  • Version control is too complex for non-technical writers

Real-World Documentation Use Cases

API Documentation Version Control

Problem

Multiple technical writers updating API documentation simultaneously, causing conflicts and version confusion when new features are released.

Solution

Implement structured commits for each API endpoint change with descriptive messages and coordinated branching strategy.

Implementation

['Create feature branches for each API update', 'Make atomic commits for individual endpoint changes', "Use standardized commit message format (e.g., 'API: Add POST /users endpoint documentation')", 'Review commits before merging to main documentation branch', 'Tag commits corresponding to API version releases']

Expected Outcome

Clear documentation history aligned with API versions, reduced conflicts, and easier rollback when API changes are reverted.

Content Review and Approval Workflow

Problem

Documentation changes need approval from subject matter experts before publication, but tracking review status and maintaining change history is difficult.

Solution

Use commits as checkpoints in the review process with specific commit messages indicating review stages.

Implementation

["Create draft commits with 'DRAFT:' prefix in commit messages", 'Submit commits to review branches for SME evaluation', 'Use commit comments to document feedback and revisions', "Create final commits with 'APPROVED:' prefix after review completion", 'Maintain separate commits for reviewer-requested changes']

Expected Outcome

Transparent approval process with full audit trail, easier identification of approved content, and clear accountability for changes.

Multi-Language Documentation Synchronization

Problem

Keeping translated documentation versions synchronized with source content updates while tracking which translations need updating.

Solution

Structure commits to clearly indicate source language changes and track translation status across language branches.

Implementation

["Commit source language changes with specific tags (e.g., 'EN: Update installation guide')", 'Create corresponding commits in translation branches referencing source commits', 'Use commit messages to indicate translation completion status', 'Implement automated tools to identify untranslated commits', 'Tag commits when all translations are synchronized']

Expected Outcome

Systematic tracking of translation needs, reduced risk of outdated translations, and clear visibility into localization progress.

Documentation Hotfix Management

Problem

Critical errors in published documentation need immediate fixes while maintaining stability of ongoing documentation projects.

Solution

Implement hotfix commit workflow that allows rapid deployment of critical fixes without disrupting main development.

Implementation

['Create hotfix branches from stable release commits', 'Make targeted commits addressing only critical issues', "Use 'HOTFIX:' prefix in commit messages for easy identification", 'Fast-track review process for hotfix commits', 'Merge hotfix commits back to both main and development branches']

Expected Outcome

Rapid resolution of critical documentation issues while maintaining project stability and ensuring fixes are preserved in all branches.

Best Practices

✓ Write Clear, Descriptive Commit Messages

Commit messages should clearly explain what was changed and why, making it easy for team members to understand the purpose of each modification without examining the actual changes.

✓ Do: Use imperative mood (e.g., 'Add troubleshooting section for login issues') and include context about why the change was necessary
✗ Don't: Write vague messages like 'updates' or 'fixes' that don't explain what was actually changed or improved

✓ Make Atomic, Focused Commits

Each commit should represent a single logical change or improvement, making it easier to track specific modifications and revert individual changes if needed.

✓ Do: Group related changes together in one commit, such as updating all references to a renamed feature across multiple documentation files
✗ Don't: Bundle unrelated changes like fixing typos, adding new content, and restructuring navigation all in the same commit

✓ Commit Frequently with Meaningful Checkpoints

Regular commits create more granular history and reduce the risk of losing work, while ensuring each commit represents a meaningful milestone in the documentation development process.

✓ Do: Commit after completing each section, fixing a set of related issues, or reaching a natural stopping point in your work
✗ Don't: Wait until the end of the day to make one massive commit with all your changes, or commit every single character change

✓ Use Consistent Commit Message Conventions

Establishing team-wide conventions for commit message format and prefixes helps maintain consistency and makes it easier to filter and search through commit history.

✓ Do: Adopt a standard format like 'TYPE: Brief description' where TYPE could be CONTENT, FIX, STRUCTURE, or UPDATE
✗ Don't: Let each team member use their own commit message style, making it difficult to understand and categorize changes

✓ Review Changes Before Committing

Always review your changes before creating a commit to ensure you're including only intended modifications and that the commit represents a complete, logical unit of work.

✓ Do: Use staging areas or diff tools to review exactly what files and lines are being committed, and verify that all changes serve the same purpose
✗ Don't: Commit changes without reviewing them, risking the inclusion of debugging content, personal notes, or unrelated modifications

How Docsie Helps with Commits

Modern documentation platforms have revolutionized how teams work with commits by integrating version control capabilities directly into user-friendly interfaces, eliminating the complexity traditionally associated with Git workflows.

  • Visual Commit Management: Browse commit history, compare versions, and understand changes through intuitive visual interfaces rather than command-line tools
  • Automated Commit Creation: Platform automatically creates commits when content is saved or published, ensuring no changes are lost while maintaining detailed history
  • Integrated Review Workflows: Combine commit tracking with built-in approval processes, allowing reviewers to see exactly what changed before approving publication
  • Branch Management Simplified: Create and manage documentation branches for different product versions or feature development without technical Git knowledge
  • Real-time Collaboration: Multiple team members can work simultaneously with automatic conflict resolution and commit merging handled by the platform
  • Release Management Integration: Link commits to product releases, automatically tag documentation versions, and maintain synchronized release notes
  • Rollback and Recovery: Easily revert to previous commits when issues arise, with one-click restoration of earlier documentation versions
See How Docsie Can Help

Related Documentation Terms

API 1 shared articles Product Documentation 1 shared articles Quality Assurance 1 shared articles Target Audience 1 shared articles User Interface 1 shared articles

Build Better Documentation with Docsie

Join thousands of teams creating outstanding documentation

Start Free Trial