BYOM

Master this essential documentation concept

Quick Definition

Bring Your Own Model - an approach that allows organizations to connect their own self-hosted AI models to a platform rather than relying on the platform's built-in third-party AI services.

How BYOM Works

graph TD OrgModel["🏒 Organization's Self-Hosted AI Model (LLaMA, Mistral, GPT4All, etc.)"] --> Adapter["BYOM Adapter Layer (API Endpoint Configuration)"] Adapter --> Auth["Authentication & Token Validation"] Auth --> Platform["Target Platform (Confluence, Notion, etc.)"] Platform --> AIFeatures["AI-Powered Features (Summarization, Q&A, Generation)"] AIFeatures --> DataStays["βœ… Data Stays On-Premises (No third-party data egress)"] ThirdParty["❌ Built-in Third-Party AI (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)"] -. Bypassed .-> Platform style OrgModel fill:#4a90d9,color:#fff style DataStays fill:#27ae60,color:#fff style ThirdParty fill:#e74c3c,color:#fff style Adapter fill:#f39c12,color:#fff

Understanding BYOM

Bring Your Own Model - an approach that allows organizations to connect their own self-hosted AI models to a platform rather than relying on the platform's built-in third-party AI services.

Key Features

  • Centralized information management
  • Improved documentation workflows
  • Better team collaboration
  • Enhanced user experience

Benefits for Documentation Teams

  • Reduces repetitive documentation tasks
  • Improves content consistency
  • Enables better content reuse
  • Streamlines review processes

Keeping Your BYOM Configuration Documented as Models Evolve

When your team integrates a self-hosted model into your existing toolchain, the setup process rarely happens in silence. Engineers walk through configuration steps on calls, security reviews get discussed in recorded meetings, and onboarding sessions cover how your specific model endpoints connect to downstream systems. That institutional knowledge lives in those recordings β€” until someone needs it six months later.

The challenge with video-only documentation for BYOM workflows is that model configurations change. Endpoint URLs get updated, authentication methods rotate, and the reasoning behind specific architectural decisions fades quickly when it's buried in a 90-minute onboarding recording. New team members can't search a video for "how we handle token limits" or "why we chose this inference endpoint over the default."

Converting those recordings into structured, searchable documentation means your BYOM setup β€” the connection logic, the security considerations, the model-specific parameters your team settled on β€” becomes something anyone can reference, update, and version alongside your actual configuration files. For example, when a new engineer needs to understand why your team routes certain request types to your self-hosted model instead of a platform default, they can find that decision documented directly rather than scrubbing through recordings.

If your team regularly records technical walkthroughs or architecture reviews around your AI integrations, see how you can turn those into living documentation β†’

Real-World Documentation Use Cases

Regulated Healthcare Provider Enabling AI Documentation Assistance Without PHI Leaving the Network

Problem

A hospital system wants to use AI to help clinical staff generate and summarize patient care documentation, but HIPAA compliance prohibits sending Protected Health Information (PHI) to external cloud-based AI services like OpenAI or Anthropic.

Solution

BYOM allows the hospital to connect their internally hosted fine-tuned medical LLM (running on on-premises GPU servers) to their documentation platform, so AI-assisted writing and summarization occurs entirely within the hospital's own network perimeter.

Implementation

["Deploy a HIPAA-compliant LLM (e.g., a fine-tuned LLaMA 3 model) on the hospital's internal Kubernetes cluster with no outbound internet access.", "Configure the BYOM adapter in the documentation platform (e.g., Confluence) to point to the internal model's REST API endpoint using an internal DNS hostname.", 'Set up mutual TLS authentication between the documentation platform and the self-hosted model endpoint to ensure only authorized services can invoke the model.', 'Validate data flow with network traffic analysis to confirm zero PHI egress before enabling AI features for clinical staff.']

Expected Outcome

Clinical documentation teams gain AI-assisted drafting and summarization capabilities while maintaining full HIPAA compliance, with audit logs confirming all inference requests remain within the hospital's private network.

Financial Services Firm Using a Domain-Tuned Model for Regulatory Compliance Documentation

Problem

A global investment bank's compliance team needs AI assistance to draft and review regulatory filings (MiFID II, Basel III reports), but generic cloud AI models produce inaccurate financial regulatory language and the firm cannot risk confidential trading data leaving their environment.

Solution

BYOM enables the firm to connect their proprietary compliance-tuned LLM β€” trained on internal regulatory documents and approved terminology β€” to their documentation platform, replacing generic AI suggestions with highly accurate, domain-specific outputs.

Implementation

["Fine-tune a base model (e.g., Mistral 7B) on the firm's internal corpus of approved regulatory filings, compliance manuals, and legal glossaries using an air-gapped training environment.", "Deploy the fine-tuned model behind the firm's internal API gateway with role-based access control restricting usage to the compliance and legal departments.", "Register the model endpoint in the documentation platform's BYOM configuration, mapping it to AI-assist features used during document drafting and review workflows.", 'Establish a model versioning protocol so compliance officers can track which model version generated which document sections for audit trail purposes.']

Expected Outcome

Regulatory filing drafting time decreases by an estimated 40%, with compliance officers reporting significantly fewer manual corrections needed compared to outputs from generic cloud AI models, and zero incidents of confidential data exposure.

Multinational Enterprise Enforcing Data Sovereignty by Routing Documentation AI Through Region-Specific Models

Problem

A European manufacturing conglomerate must comply with GDPR data residency requirements, meaning employee and operational data used in internal documentation cannot be processed on servers outside the EU β€” ruling out most US-headquartered AI cloud providers.

Solution

BYOM lets the enterprise deploy separate self-hosted model instances in EU-based data centers for each regional subsidiary, connecting each instance to the documentation platform so that AI assistance for each team is processed exclusively within the legally required geographic boundary.

Implementation

['Provision GPU-enabled virtual machines in EU-West and EU-Central Azure regions (or equivalent on-premises hardware) and deploy isolated model instances (e.g., Ollama serving Mistral) on each.', 'Configure geolocation-aware BYOM endpoint routing in the documentation platform so that users authenticated from EU tenants are directed to the EU-resident model endpoints.', 'Implement data residency attestation logging at the model API layer to generate compliance reports showing that all inference requests originated and were processed within EU boundaries.', 'Conduct a GDPR Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) documenting the BYOM architecture as evidence of technical measures for data residency compliance.']

Expected Outcome

The enterprise passes GDPR audit reviews with documented proof of EU data residency for all AI-assisted documentation workflows, avoiding potential fines and enabling AI productivity tools to be rolled out to EU employees who were previously excluded.

Defense Contractor Integrating a Classified-Network AI Model into Technical Documentation Workflows

Problem

An aerospace defense contractor's engineering teams need AI assistance to write and review classified technical specifications and system design documents, but classified networks are physically air-gapped from the internet, making any cloud-based AI service completely inaccessible.

Solution

BYOM enables the contractor to run a self-hosted model on the classified network itself and connect it to an on-premises instance of their documentation platform, bringing AI capabilities into the air-gapped environment without any network bridge to external services.

Implementation

["Obtain and transfer approved open-weight model weights (e.g., LLaMA 3 via approved media transfer process) onto the classified network's local model registry following security protocols.", 'Deploy the model using an on-premises inference server (e.g., vLLM or llama.cpp) on hardware certified for the classification level of the network.', 'Install and configure an on-premises instance of the documentation platform (e.g., Confluence Data Center) and register the local model endpoint via the BYOM configuration interface.', 'Conduct security certification testing to verify no covert channel exists between the AI model inference layer and any unclassified network segment before granting user access.']

Expected Outcome

Engineering teams on classified programs gain AI-assisted documentation capabilities for the first time, reducing technical specification drafting cycles while maintaining full compliance with government security accreditation requirements for the classified environment.

Best Practices

βœ“ Expose Your Self-Hosted Model Through a Standardized OpenAI-Compatible API Interface

Most documentation platforms that support BYOM expect an API contract similar to the OpenAI Chat Completions API format. Wrapping your self-hosted model (whether LLaMA, Mistral, or a custom model) behind a compatibility layer such as LiteLLM, Ollama, or a custom FastAPI proxy ensures the platform can communicate with your model without bespoke integration code. This also makes it straightforward to swap underlying models without reconfiguring the platform.

βœ“ Do: Deploy an OpenAI-compatible proxy (e.g., LiteLLM gateway) in front of your self-hosted model so the documentation platform connects to a stable, standardized interface regardless of what model or inference engine runs behind it.
βœ— Don't: Don't expose a proprietary or non-standard API directly to the platform and expect it to work without custom connectors β€” this creates brittle integrations that break whenever either the model or the platform updates.

βœ“ Enforce Mutual TLS and Short-Lived Token Authentication Between the Platform and Your Model Endpoint

The primary security motivation for BYOM is keeping sensitive data within your control, but this benefit is nullified if the connection between the documentation platform and your model endpoint is not properly secured. An unauthenticated or weakly authenticated model endpoint could be invoked by unauthorized parties, exposing your model's capabilities or leaking prompt data. Mutual TLS (mTLS) combined with short-lived bearer tokens provides defense-in-depth for this critical data path.

βœ“ Do: Configure mTLS with certificates issued by your internal PKI for the platform-to-model connection, and rotate API tokens on a schedule (e.g., every 24 hours) using a secrets management tool like HashiCorp Vault or AWS Secrets Manager.
βœ— Don't: Don't use a single long-lived static API key hardcoded in the platform's BYOM configuration β€” if that key is compromised, attackers can freely query your model or intercept documentation content sent as prompts.

βœ“ Implement Request and Response Logging at the Model Gateway for Audit and Debugging

When AI-generated content appears in official documentation, organizations need to know which model version produced it, when, and based on what prompt. Logging at the BYOM gateway layer (not just application logs) captures the full inference request lifecycle, which is essential for compliance audits, debugging unexpected model outputs, and tracking model performance over time. Ensure logs are stored in your SIEM or log management platform with appropriate retention policies.

βœ“ Do: Deploy structured logging at your model API gateway that captures timestamp, requesting user identity (passed via the platform), model version, token counts, latency, and a hash of the prompt for traceability β€” while redacting any PII from log payloads per your data policies.
βœ— Don't: Don't log full prompt and response bodies to unprotected log files on the model server β€” prompts often contain sensitive document content, and unprotected logs create a secondary data exposure risk that undermines the entire purpose of BYOM.

βœ“ Version and Tag Your Self-Hosted Models Explicitly and Tie Model Versions to Documentation Platform Configurations

AI model behavior changes between versions β€” a model update that improves general quality may alter tone, terminology, or formatting in ways that affect documentation consistency. Without explicit model versioning tied to your BYOM configuration, it becomes impossible to reproduce a specific AI output or understand why documentation quality changed after a model update. Treat model versions as first-class artifacts in your change management process.

βœ“ Do: Tag each deployed model version with a semantic version identifier (e.g., internal-compliance-llm:2.1.0), record which version is active in the BYOM configuration at any given time, and maintain a changelog of model updates that links to documentation quality review results.
βœ— Don't: Don't use a 'latest' tag or mutable model reference in your BYOM endpoint configuration β€” this makes it impossible to roll back to a known-good model version when a new release produces degraded or inconsistent documentation outputs.

βœ“ Capacity Plan Your Self-Hosted Model Infrastructure Based on Concurrent Documentation Platform Usage Patterns

Unlike cloud AI APIs that scale elastically, your self-hosted BYOM model has fixed hardware capacity. If the documentation platform's AI features trigger simultaneous inference requests from many users β€” such as during a team sprint where everyone is writing docs at once β€” an undersized model server will experience severe latency or request queuing that degrades the user experience and may cause platform-side timeouts. Proactive capacity planning based on measured usage patterns prevents this.

βœ“ Do: Instrument your model gateway to track peak concurrent requests and p95 latency during normal usage, then provision model serving infrastructure (GPU memory, replica count) to handle at least 2x the observed peak load, using horizontal scaling with a load balancer if your inference engine supports it.
βœ— Don't: Don't size your BYOM model infrastructure based solely on average request volume β€” documentation AI usage is bursty by nature (everyone generates content during sprint planning or release cycles), and average-based sizing will result in poor performance precisely when teams need it most.

How Docsie Helps with BYOM

Build Better Documentation with Docsie

Join thousands of teams creating outstanding documentation

Start Free Trial